gAGING, FITNESS AND FAILUREh: EFFECTS OF AGE AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY ON CARDIOVASCULAR STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION

 

Benjamin D. Levine

Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas, and UT Southwestern Medical Center

 

Aging leads to a loss of functional capacity which is compounded by reductions in physical activity.  Indeed, we demonstrated recently that 3 weeks of bedrest causes a greater reduction in maximal oxygen transport than 30 years of aging.  Comprehensive invasive assessment of LV performance and pressure-volume (p/v) relations as well as Doppler assessment of relaxation demonstrated that healthy but sedentary aging leads to: 1) a leftward and upward shift of the diastolic p/v curve leading to increased static chamber stiffness and decreased distensibility; 2) this change in cardiac compliance can be prevented by life-long endurance training – Masters athletes (>25 yrs training) have p/v curves that are identical to young individuals; 3) despite this clear preservation of cardiac compliance, life-long training does NOT prevent the slowing of ventricular relaxation associated with aging.  Specifically, across a wide range of cardiac filling pressures (LVEDP from ~ 3 mmHg to ~ 20 mmHg) IVRT was much slower in both sedentary seniors and Masters athletes compared to young controls at any given level of cardiac filling, with no effect of fitness;  myocardial relaxation velocities (TDI) were also slower in both senior groups, as was propagation velocity.  Thus life-long endurance training has differential effects on static vs dynamic diastolic function.  We are currently studying the gdoseh of exercise that is required to obtain the maximum protective effects on cardiovascular structure with aging.

Using these same methods, we recruited a highly selected set of patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) to compare with healthy, aged matched controls.  As a group, HFpEF patients had p/v curves that were shifted even further upward and leftward compared to healthy seniors.  On closer inspection though, there was a marked gender difference in these curves:  male HFpEF patients had much stiffer hearts than their healthy sedentary controls; however female HFpEF patients hearts were not any stiffer than sedentary aged matched women; both groups had static chamber stiffness that was equivalent to the male HFpEF patients.  TDI velocities were much slower in HFpEF patients than sedentary seniors.  Surprisingly, despite marked reductions in VO2max in HFpEF patients compared to age matched controls, their cardiac power output reserve was the same, and the increase in cardiac output per unit increase in oxygen uptake was dramatically elevated, to a level typically seen in patients with mitochondrial myopathies. These data suggest that: 1) compared to healthy sedentary seniors, male HFpEF patients have hearts that are stiffer and relax much more slowly; 2) both healthy, sedentary senior females and female HFpEF patients have hearts that are equally as stiff and slowly relaxing as HFpEF men, providing at least one explanation why this disease is more prevalent in women.  During exercise, a reduced capacity for mitochondrial oxidation leads to a signal for elevated cardiac output during exercise which given their stiff, slowly relaxing hearts provide the substrate for dyspnea and exercise intolerance.

 

Key words:  aging, diastolic function, heart failure, exercise capacity